Many great POC bloggers recently received a shout-out in the Boston Globe for their phenomenal anti-oppression coverage, specifically in the area of race relations:

These intellectual challenges to mainstream and other viewpoints are some of the opinions Latino, Asian/Pacific Islander-American, and black bloggers are exposing on a growing number of sites focused on social, political, and cultural issues. The sometimes facetiously named blogs range from Angry Asian Man to The Angry Black Woman. Readers can find Latino viewpoints at Guanabee, The Unapologetic Mexican, or Latino Pundit. Those interested in information from an Asian angle head to Ultrabrown, Zuky, or Sepia Mutiny. Sites created by blacks include The Field Negro, Too Sense, and Resist Racism.

The article also gives extensive coverage to Baratunde Thurston, also known as Jack Turner of Jack and Jill Politics, and Carmen Van Kerckhove, who runs the anti-racism training company New Demographic and heads up the pop culture blog Racialicious. I’m proud of all of them, and when Nezua of The Unapologetic Mexican shared the shout-out on his blog, commenter Will noted the compliment the author of this article extended:

But often these bloggers discard the handcuffs of their ethnic origins to tackle subjects affecting a range of racial or ethnic groups.

There was a brief pause in the congratulatory air after reading that sentence. (But trust me, the celebration continues!) However, what exactly does this statement imply about critical race analysis of media exposure and social phenomena? Specifically, is there a danger in choosing to focus on one’s own race rather than taking a more racially inclusive approach to fighting oppression? Can a person be handcuffed by their ethnic origins, resulting in a limited view of that person’s social environment? 

William Saletan is closing out his series on Race, Intelligence and Genes. It is a disappointment.

from: William Saletan
All God's Children
Posted Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2007, at 7:54 AM ET

Why write about this topic? Why hurt people's feelings? Why gratify bigots?

Because truth matters. Because the truth isn't as bad as our ignorant, half-formed fears and suspicions about it. And because you can't solve a problem till you understand it.

Two days ago, I said we could fight the evidence of racial differences in IQ, or we could accept it. Yesterday I outlined the difficulty of fighting it. What happens if we accept it? Can we still believe in equality?

Mr. Saletan feels he's done a good thing here. There's a number of comment threads at Slate that question that assumption, as do I.